|
The Seed for our Project:
A Graduate Seminar Based on Collaboration between Computer
Science Students, Faculty and People with Cognitive Impairments
In the spring of 2000, the mutual interests of Professors Fickas
and Sohlberg at the University of Oregon led to the formation
of a graduate seminar for students in advanced software
engineering. In particular, the following grad students participated in
the seminar:
- Robert Ansell-Bell (bertie@cs.uoregon.edu)
- Xing Hu (xh0210@yahoo.com)
- James Joule (jjoule@cs.uoregon.edu)
- Kathleen Lindlan (klindlan@cs.uoregon.edu)
- Adenike Okedara
- Dustin Preuitt
- Ionel Pusca (ionel_pusca@yahoo.com)
- Rui Rui
- Matthew Sottile
- James Suruda (jim@suruda.com)
- Ronglin Wang
- XingXing Wu
- Longhu Zhao
The seminar was conducted with the help of several persons
with brain injury and their caregivers and written up as
a model course demonstrating the effectiveness of multidisciplinary
teaching collaboration.
The seminar focused on developing assistive technology to address
social isolation problems faced by people with cognitive difficulties.
Three of the clients and one of their caregivers from Dr.
Sohlberg's clinic acted as consultants to the seminar students
providing feedback to their developments. Clients had two
kinds of isolation problems: 1) difficulty writing and keeping
in touch with friends and family and 2) inability to independently
access the community and venture into the community unattended.
The students in the course worked to develop a web-enabled distributed
system prototype that supported both e-mail interaction
and a travel assistant device to be worn while navigating
city streets. More generally, the components of the computer
prototypes included:
A cyberevaluation component: Students built a tool to
evaluate a user's cyberspace skill set (i.e., the user's ability
to use internet tools such as e-mail) The user interacted
with the evaluation tool through a web interface,responding
to a set of tasks. The outcome of the evaluation was coded
and stored in a user profile. Examples of skill sets that
were evaluated included cognitive skills (e.g., ability
to learn the procedures) and physical abilities (e.g., ability
to read the screen, depress keys etc.)
An e-mail toolkit: Instead of supplying a single e-mail
system, the students built a toolkit that allows construction
of a family of e-mail systems. The goals were to begin the
process of building a tailored e-mail toolkit matching the
skillset of the user. The output of the cyberevaluation
system guided the construction of the e-mail tools.
A travel assistant: The goal of this component was to
store navigation information, the destination of the user, and
to use Global Positioning System (GPS) to guide the user to
the destination. The device was capable of wireless internet
connection, and could call for help if a user wandered off
course or pushed a panic button.
After the seminar concluded, Fickas and Sohlberg evaluated the
results with input from the student and class consultants with
cognitive impairments and drew the following conclusions:
- While the travel assistant component was interesting,
social isolation needs could be addressed more quickly
by focusing on the e-mail applications.
- The process of incorporating multidisciplinary perspectives
(cognitive rehabilitation, users/caregivers, and computer
scientists) in the design and evaluation of e-mail prototypes
was very effective.
- The complexity and importance of user acceptance of
assistive technology and caregiver support was critical
and needs further study. Increasing understanding requires
longitudinal data gathered by observing users in naturalistic
settings over time.
- The prototypes that came out of the seminar provided
enough of a proof of concept to warrant further exploration.
These conclusions encouraged Drs. Fickas and Sohlberg to form
a preliminary collaborative research group. They conducted an
exploratory pilot project
described on this Web Site over the summer (2000) to hone
in on the research questions of import and gain a broader
perspective of research problems and opportunities.
|